Load Floor
2003 Renault Megane



Nominee Number: 38 Result: WINNER (tie)
Category: Materials Description: Load Floor
OEM: Renault Model: Megane
Model Year: 2003 System Supplier: InoPlastic Omnium
System Contact: Matt Orlando System Phone: 248-310-2192
Model/Processor: InoPlastic Omnium Molder Contact: Matt Orlando
Molder Phone: 248-310-2192 Toolmaker: -
Tool Contact: - Tool Phone: -
Material Supplier: MCR Composite Material Contact: Matt Orlando
Material Phone: 248-310-2192 Generic Resin Type: SMC
Resin Trade Name: - Grade: -
OEM Engineer: - OEM Title: -
OEM Phone: - Name of Nominee: Matt Orlando
Nominee's Company: InoPlastic Omnium Nominee's Address: 2610 Bond Street
Rochester Hills, MI 48309
Nominee's Phone: 248-310-2192 Nominee's Fax: -
Nominee's Email: morlando@plasticomnium.com    
Summary: Development of a material for a load floor that allows a part-to-part cycle of 60 seconds therefore allowing economies of scale and volume competitive with steel at 1200 parts per day.  Weight savings: 4 kg/vehicle compared to steel.
Most Innovative Feature: The material for this application was developed especially for high-volume applications. It allows a part-to-part cycle of 60 seconds therefore allowing economies of scale and volume competitive with steel at 1200 parts per day.
Other Innovative Features: The material development also included a customer request for low specific gravity of 1.4 while maintaining toughness. It was also an enabler for the customer who could process his vehicle without a rear floor. This enabled robots to enter the vehicle during the BIW construction to place spot welds in positions normally impossible to get access to. Additionally, the elpo process was enhanced as the draining of elpo is much more rapid and without puddling when the rear floor is removed. These points improve overall scrap and reduce the number of secondary holes for drains.
What Forming Process? Traditional compression molding was employed in the part.
First Time Process Used: No.
Previous Process: The most frequent material for this application is steel. However, due to the customer production method (seven body styles and three production locations) traditional stamping methods would have been prohibitively expensive.
Tooling Innovations: Specific robotic end-of-arm mechanisms were developed in order to remove the part, blow out the flash and load the next material blank in the shortest possible cycle time.
New Material Developments: See above.
Weight Savings: This design saved 4 kg/vehicle compared to steel.
Cost Savings: N/A.
Cost Avoidance: N/A.
Direct Consumer Benefit: The development of the part included matching of the natural frequencies to vehicle dynamics to ensure a higher 1st and 2nd modal response thereby reducing the noise in the vehicle. This design also generates an additional 20 liters of interior compartment space compared to steel.
Translates to Other Vehicles?: It can be readily applied to other vehicles.
Safety Benefits: N/A.
Environmental Benefits: N/A.
Additional Comments: N/A.